Opened 23 months ago
Closed 16 months ago
#730 closed enhancement (fixed)
no limit on CV generation results
| Reported by: | valkyrie | Owned by: | valkyrie |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | |
| Component: | WebSearch | Version: | |
| Keywords: | INSPIRE | Cc: |
Description
similar to (adn depends on) #363
Make sure it's possible to generate CVs all at once, rather than having them be broken into chunks.
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 23 months ago by valkyrie
- Owner set to valkyrie
- Status changed from new to assigned
comment:2 Changed 23 months ago by hoc
comment:3 Changed 23 months ago by valkyrie
Good to know! Thanks!
comment:4 Changed 23 months ago by valkyrie
And which format is the CV format? Or should all formats be able to show up to 1000 records at a time?
comment:5 Changed 23 months ago by hoc
I don't think the CV format has been created yet. Tibor might have more information on that. It has a latex version:
http://www.yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp/cgi-bin/spiface/find/hep/www?rawcmd=fin+a+c+quigg&FORMAT=WWWNOLIMLATEX3
and html version
http://www.yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp/cgi-bin/spiface/find/hep/www?rawcmd=fin+a+c+quigg&FORMAT=WWWBRIEF&SEQUENCE=
and a plain text version suitable for cut-and-paste into Word
http://www.yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp/cgi-bin/spiface/find/hep/www?rawcmd=fin+a+c+quigg&FORMAT=WWWBRIEFNOHTML&SEQUENCE=
comment:6 Changed 23 months ago by hoc
I don't think that the non-cv records need 1,000 at a time. The CV formats only need it because in creating a reference list it's annoying to have to keep scrolling through screens to cut and paste into a document (or perhaps they're using wget or something like that). In all the other formats, people are actually looking at the results, so 100 at a time ought to be plenty.
comment:7 Changed 16 months ago by annetteh
- Status changed from assigned to in_merge
Seems to be solved
comment:8 Changed 16 months ago by annetteh
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from in_merge to closed

CVs are almost always generated for authors. I think the highest author list is only around 900 (maybe Ellis or Barger), so it's unlikely someone would want to be presented with 20,000 records - if that happens, it's probably a mistake.